Category: Uncategorized

  • India wants more passenger jets. Can it also build them?

    India wants more passenger jets. Can it also build them?


    LightRocket via Getty Images The white and red coloured Rossiya Sukhoi Superjet 100 aircraft is preparing to land at Pulkovo Airport in St. Petersburg, in the Russian FederationLightRocket via Getty Images

    Delhi and Moscow have signed a deal to manufacture the SJ-100 plane in India

    India is one of the world’s fastest-growing aviation markets.

    IndiGo and Air India, which together hold over 90% of the market, have ordered nearly 1,500 planes over the next decade, highlighting soaring passenger demand.

    This expansion hinges on Boeing and Airbus, which together supply 86% of the world’s aircraft and faced “historically high” delivery backlogs in 2024 – delays expected to affect Indian orders too.

    This has revived an old question: should India try to build its own passenger planes?

    The prospect drew attention in October, when India and Russia signed an initial agreement in Moscow to manufacture the SJ-100 passenger plane in India, raising hopes for domestic aircraft production.

    But is the Russia deal a solution? Its joint manufacturing plan still faces many hurdles before coming to fruition.

    Getty Images Airplane at sunset above the clouds. Travel by airGetty Images

    India is among the world’s fastest growing aviation markets

    The SJ-100 is a twin-engine aircraft that can carry up to 103 passengers and is already in service with several Russian airlines, according to its manufacturer, United Aircraft Corporation (UAC).

    Delhi has described the aircraft as a “game changer” and plans to use it for short-haul routes. But experts have questioned the project’s cost and feasibility – much of which is still unclear.

    One of the biggest concerns is whether the Russian firm would be able to rapidly set up and scale production in India.

    The aircraft’s manufacturer says it delivered around 200 SJ-100 aircraft between 2008 and 2020. But that trajectory shifted in 2022 when Russia launched its war against Ukraine.

    Western sanctions cut off key spare parts, forcing the company to replace about 40 systems and operate an “import-substituted” version in 2023. Europe’s aviation safety regulator withdrew the aircraft’s certification, effectively banning the SJ-100 and other Russian planes from its airspace.

    India has long aimed to build passenger aircraft domestically but has achieved only limited success.

    In 1959, the government set up the National Aerospace Laboratories (NAL) to develop “small and medium-sized civil aircraft”.

    The facility has developed the two-seater Hansa and five-seater trainer planes, but larger passenger aircraft remain out of reach.

    In the 1960s, India built passenger planes under foreign licenses. State-run Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) produced dozens of UK-designed Avro 748 jets, used by both commercial airlines and the military before being phased out.

    In the 1980s, India partnered with German firm Dornier to produce a 19-seat passenger jet, some of which still serve the military and limited civil routes.

    With the momentum going, India has also tried to ingeniously design its own small passenger planes.

    Hindustan Times via Getty Images Passengers seen in heavy rush and chaos at the IndiGo counter at Indira Gandhi International Airport Terminal 1 after a technical glitch at IndiGo caused delays and cancellations of multiple flights on December 4, 2025 in New Delhi, IndiaHindustan Times via Getty Images

    Thousands of passengers were stranded across airports after IndiGo cancelled flights last month

    In 2000, India also signed an agreement with Russia for help in manufacturing the NAL’s 15-seater Saras aircraft. The plane made its maiden flight in May 2004, but the project was stalled in 2009 after three pilots were killed during an accident involving its second prototype.

    The project was revived by the Indian government years later with the next prototype Saras MK2, a 19-seater plane, but it is still awaiting certification.

    Another such project, the Regional Transport Aircraft (RTA) has also seen very little progress through the years. Feasibility reports for the 90-seater, comparable to the Russian SJ-100, were submitted in 2011, with little progress since.

    Aviation experts say aircraft manufacturing in India has faced hurdles for a long time now.

    Dr Abhay Pashilkar, director of NAL, points that the “lack of large domestic demand” until recently, along with a shortage of highly skilled manpower and a small domestic manufacturing ecosystem, has held back growth in the sector.

    The way out, he adds, is “to engage with Indian as well as global manufacturers”.

    So, could the SJ-100 project indeed be a game-changer?

    For now, it appears so.

    The plan offers a “practical approach” as India’s own projects are nowhere near completion, says Gopal Sutar, former spokesperson of the HAL.

    For Moscow as well, wider acceptance of the SJ-100 would prove that they could make a civil aircraft without western technology.

    While the deal comes with clear trade-offs and leaves questions about the future of India’s aviation manufacturing ambitions, experts like Mr Sutar argue that Russia’s role as a “steadfast supporter” of India remains key.

    “Sanctions could pose challenges, but that would have been factored in by both countries,” he said.

    Aircraft availability is only part of India’s aviation challenge; rapid expansion also hinges on trained crews.

    Earlier this month, IndiGo cancelled thousands of flights due to “poor planning of pilot rosters,” leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded for hours or even days.

    Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook.





    Source link

  • Tokyo fish auction sees bluefin tuna fetching record $3.2m

    Tokyo fish auction sees bluefin tuna fetching record $3.2m


    A bulky bluefin tuna made a splash at Tokyo’s Toyosu fish market on Monday morning, fetching a record 510.3 million yen ($3.2m; £2.4m) at the market’s first auction of the year.

    The winning bid for the 243kg fish came from Kiyomura Corp, the operator of popular sushi chain Sushi Zanmai, which has outlets across the country and abroad.

    “The year’s first tuna brings good luck,” said Kiyoshi Kimura, the company’s president and a familiar figure at the annual new year’s auction, Kyodo reported.

    Mr Kimura, who has been dubbed the Tuna King, is known to bid high for bluefin tuna at new year’s auctions.

    The entrepreneur told reporters after the auction that he was “surprised at the price”, AFP reported.

    “I’d thought we would be able to buy a little cheaper, but the price soared before you knew it,” he said.

    Mr Kimura paid 56.5 million yen for a bluefin tuna in 2012 and 155 million yen in 2013 – setting record prices both times.

    In 2019 he bought a bluefin tuna with 333.6 million yen ($2.1m; £1.6m) – another historic price.

    Despite telling reporters at the time that he thought he “did too much”, however, Mr Kimura has now gone on to break his own record again.

    The first auction at Tokyo’s Toyosu fish market typically sees fish selling for exorbitant prices.

    Last year, the first tuna at the auction was bought for 207 million yen by Onodera Group, another food company that owns a sushi chain. It said that the fish would be served at its restaurants across the country.

    The frenetic energy at fish markets during such pre-dawn auctions has become a popular tourist attraction in Tokyo. Monday’s auction, which started at around 05:00 local time (20:00 GMT), was no exception.

    The million-dollar tuna was sliced up for customers at Kimura’s sushi restaurants shortly after it was auctioned off.

    “I feel like I’ve begun the year in a good way after eating something so auspicious as the year starts,” one of the customers at Mr Kimura’s restaurant told AFP.



    Source link

  • Ten found guilty of cyber-bullying Brigitte Macron

    Ten found guilty of cyber-bullying Brigitte Macron


    Ten people have been found guilty of cyber-bullying Brigitte Macron, the wife of French President Emmanuel Macron, by a Paris court.

    The defendants were accused of spreading false claims about her gender and sexuality, as well as making “malicious remarks” about the 24-year age gap between the couple.

    Most of the defendants were handed suspended prison sentences of up to eight months, but one was jailed immediately for failing to attend court. Some had their social media accounts suspended.

    The judge said the eight men and two women had acted with a clear desire to do harm to Brigitte Macron, making remarks online that were degrading and insulting.

    Two of the defendants – self-styled independent journalist Natacha Rey and internet fortune-teller Amandine Roy – were found guilty of slander in 2024 for claiming that France’s first lady had never existed.

    They said her brother Jean-Michel Trogneux had changed gender and started using her name.

    They were later cleared on appeal. The argument used by the appeals court in clearing them was that saying someone had changed gender was not necessarily an “attack on their honour”.

    The Macrons are now taking that case to the high court of appeal.

    “The most important things are the prevention courses and the suspension of some of the accounts” of the perpetrators, Jean Ennochi, Brigitte Macron’s lawyer, said after the verdict was handed down, the AFP news agency reported.

    Tiphaine Auzière, Brigitte Macron’s daughter from a previous marriage, previously told the trial that the cyber-bullying had negatively affected her mother’s health and living conditions.

    She said her mother “has had to be careful about her choices of outfits, of posture… she knows perfectly well that her image will be used to back these theories”.

    While her mother had “learned to live with it”, Auzière said, she suffered from the repercussions on her grandchildren who were taunted at school.

    Monday’s ruling in France is a forerunner of a much bigger trial due in the US, where the Macrons have filed a defamation lawsuit against right-wing influencer Candace Owens, who has also voiced conspiracy theories about the first lady’s gender.

    They alleged that she “disregarded all credible evidence disproving her claim in favour of platforming known conspiracy theorists and proven defamers”.

    Owens has regularly repeated the claims on her podcast and social media channels, and in March 2024 stated that she would stake her “entire professional reputation” on her belief that the first lady “is in fact a man”.

    The presidential couple were initially advised that the best course was to ignore the online gossip, because to go to law would simply amplify it.

    But last year there was a radical change of course.

    The Macrons decided that the scale of the online attacks was now too large to ignore. So, at risk of exposing their private selves in a US court, they determined to push back against the conspiracy theorists.

    A conspiracy theory claiming that Brigitte Macron is a transgender woman has circulated since her husband was first elected in 2017.

    Brigitte Macron first met her now-husband when she was a teacher at his secondary school.

    The couple married in 2007, when the future French president was 29 and she was in her mid-50s.



    Source link