Category: Uncategorized

  • Researchers Observe In-the-Wild Exploitation of BeyondTrust CVSS 9.9 Vulnerability

    Researchers Observe In-the-Wild Exploitation of BeyondTrust CVSS 9.9 Vulnerability


    Threat actors have started to exploit a recently disclosed critical security flaw impacting BeyondTrust Remote Support (RS) and Privileged Remote Access (PRA) products, according to watchTowr.

    “Overnight we observed first in-the-wild exploitation of BeyondTrust across our global sensors,” Ryan Dewhurst, head of threat intelligence at watchTowr, said in a post on X. “Attackers are abusing get_portal_info to extract the x-ns-company value before establishing a WebSocket channel.”

    The vulnerability in question is CVE-2026-1731 (CVS score: 9.9), which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution by sending specially crafted requests.

    BeyondTrust noted last week that successful exploitation of the shortcoming could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to execute operating system commands in the context of the site user, resulting in unauthorized access, data exfiltration, and service disruption.

    Cybersecurity

    It has been patched in the following versions. All PRA versions 25.1 and greater do not require patching for this vulnerability.

    Please update the version numbers –

    • Remote Support – Patch BT26-02-RS (v21.3 – 25.3.1)
    • Privileged Remote Access – Patch BT26-02-PRA (v22.1 – 24.X)

    GreyNoise said Defused Cyber has also confirmed in-the-wild exploitation attempts of CVE-2026-1731, with the former noting that it observed reconnaissance efforts targeting the vulnerability less than 24 hours after the availability of a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit.

    “A single IP accounts for 86% of all observed reconnaissance sessions so far. It’s associated with a commercial VPN service hosted by a provider in Frankfurt,” the company said. “This isn’t a new actor; it’s an established scanning operation that rapidly added CVE-2026-1731 checks to its toolkit.”

    The use of CVE-2026-1731 demonstrates how quickly threat actors can weaponize new vulnerabilities, significantly shrinking the window for defenders to patch critical systems.

    CISA Adds 4 Flaws to KEV Catalog

    The development comes as the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added four vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, citing evidence of active exploitation. The list of vulnerabilities is as follows –

    • CVE-2026-20700 (CVSS score: 7.8) – An improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer vulnerability in Apple iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, and visionOS that could allow an attacker with memory write capability to execute arbitrary code.
    • CVE-2025-15556 (CVSS score: 7.7) – A download of code without an integrity check vulnerability in Notepad++ that could allow an attacker to intercept or redirect update traffic to download and execute an attacker-controlled installer and lead to arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user.
    • CVE-2025-40536 (CVSS score: 8.1) – A security control bypass vulnerability in SolarWinds Web Help Desk that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain access to certain restricted functionality.
    • CVE-2024-43468 (CVSS score: 9.8) – An SQL injection vulnerability in Microsoft Configuration Manager that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute commands on the server and/or underlying database by sending specially crafted requests.

    It’s worth noting that CVE-2024-43468 was patched by Microsoft in October 2024 as part of its Patch Tuesday updates. It’s currently unclear how this vulnerability is being exploited in real-world attacks. Nor is there any information about the identity of the threat actors exploiting the flaw and the scale of such efforts.

    The addition of CVE-2024-43468 to the KEV catalog follows a recent report from Microsoft about a multi‑stage intrusion that involved the threat actors exploiting internet‑exposed SolarWinds Web Help Desk (WHD) instances to obtain initial access and move laterally across the organization’s network to other high-value assets.

    However, the Windows maker said it’s not evident if the attacks exploited CVE-2025-40551, CVE-2025-40536, or CVE-2025-26399, since attacks occurred in December 2025 and on machines vulnerable to both the old and new sets of vulnerabilities.

    As for CVE-2026-20700, Apple acknowledged that the shortcoming may have been exploited in an extremely sophisticated attack against specific targeted individuals on versions of iOS before iOS 26, raising the possibility that it was leveraged to deliver commercial spyware. It was fixed by the tech giant earlier this week.

    Cybersecurity

    Lastly, the exploitation of CVE-2025-15556 has been attributed by Rapid7 to a China-linked state-sponsored threat actor called Lotus Blossom (aka Billbug, Bronze Elgin, G0030, Lotus Panda, Raspberry Typhoon, Spring Dragon, and Thrip). It’s known to be active since at least 2009.

    The targeted attacks have been found to deliver a previously undocumented backdoor called Chrysalis. While the supply chain attack was fully plugged on December 2, 2025, the compromise of the Notepad++ update pipeline is estimated to have spanned nearly five months between June and October 2025.

    The DomainTools Investigations (DTI) team described the incident as precise and a “quiet, methodical intrusion” that points to a covert intelligence-gathering mission designed to keep operational noise as low as possible. It also characterized the threat actor as having a penchant for long dwell times and multi-year campaigns.

    An important aspect of the campaign is that the Notepad++ source code was left intact, instead relying on trojanized installers to deliver the malicious payloads. This, in turn, allowed the attackers to bypass source-code reviews and integrity checks, effectively enabling them to stay undetected for extended periods, DTI added.

    “From their foothold inside the update infrastructure, the attackers did not indiscriminately push malicious code to the global Notepad++ user base,” it said. “Instead, they exercised restraint, selectively diverting update traffic for a narrow set of targets, organizations, and individuals whose positions, access, or technical roles made them strategically valuable.”

    “By abusing a legitimate update mechanism relied upon specifically by developers and administrators, they transformed routine maintenance into a covert entry point for high-value access. The campaign reflects continuity in purpose, a sustained focus on regional strategic intelligence, executed with more sophisticated, more subtle, and harder-to-detect methods than in prior iterations.”

    LevelBlue SpiderLabs, in a report investigating the Notepad++ update breach, has urged users to upgrade Notepad++ to version 8.9.1 or later, optionally disable the WinGUp auto-updater during installation, and ensure the update utility communicates only with legitimate update servers.

    In light of active exploitation of these vulnerabilities, Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies have until February 15, 2026, to address CVE-2025-40536, and till March 5, 2026, to fix the remaining three.

    Update

    The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), on February 13, 2026, added CVE-2026-1731 to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, requiring Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to apply the fix by February 16, 2026.

    Researchers from security firm Arctic Wolf have detected attacks that target Remote Support and Privileged Remote Access deployments through CVE-2026-1731, attempting to deploy the SimpleHelp remote management and monitoring (RMM) tool for persistence and perform lateral movement to other systems on the network.

    “AdsiSearcher was used to obtain Active Directory computer inventory,” Arctic Wolf said. “PSexec was used to execute the SimpleHelp installation across multiple devices in affected environments. We also observed Impacket SMBv2 session setup requests early in affected environments.”



    Source link

  • Vanguard’s BND Offers Bigger Pay and Lower Fees Than Fidelity’s FIGB

    Vanguard’s BND Offers Bigger Pay and Lower Fees Than Fidelity’s FIGB


    Both the Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (NASDAQ:BND) and the Fidelity Investment Grade Bond ETF (NYSEMKT:FIGB) aim to serve as core bond holdings, providing easy access to a diversified portfolio of high-grade U.S. bonds. This comparison examines cost, performance, risk, liquidity, and portfolio composition to help investors decide which fund best fits their needs.

    Metric

    FIGB

    BND

    Issuer

    Fidelity

    Vanguard

    Expense ratio

    0.36%

    0.03%

    1-yr return (as of Feb. 15, 2026)

    4.13%

    4.19%

    Dividend yield

    4.07%

    3.9%

    Beta

    0.28

    0.27

    AUM

    $423.78 million

    $389.22 billion

    Beta measures price volatility relative to the S&P 500; beta is calculated from five-year weekly returns. The 1-yr return represents total return over the trailing 12 months.

    BND is much more affordable in terms of fees but has a lower dividend yield. Both funds are very similar in one-year returns and beta.

    Metric

    FIGB

    BND

    Max drawdown (4 y)

    -15.02%

    -14.37%

    For nearly 20 years, BND has tracked the broad U.S. investment-grade bond market, holding a large basket of 15,000 securities. It is designed for investors seeking balanced exposure across Treasuries, mortgage-backed securities, and investment-grade corporates.

    FIGB is one of the newer bond ETFs in the market, launched slightly less than 5 years ago. It holds significantly fewer assets than BND, with 735, but it offers a similar broad approach to the fixed-income sector.

    For more guidance on ETF investing, check out the full guide at this link.

    Both funds are very similar, but BND may have the edge over FIGB, as it has a significantly lower expense ratio, and actually has a higher dividend payout than FIGB, even though its yield percentage is smaller because its price is $30 higher than FIGB’s.

    BND also has a slightly higher percentage in U.S. government and AAA bonds than FIGB, while maintaining the diversity of lower-rated bonds. Opting for FIGB may offer slightly higher price return potential than BND due to the increased volatility associated with the lower-rated holdings, but the difference in holdings between the two funds isn’t substantial.

    What may be a unique benefit of investing in FIGB is that it’s very young compared to other bond ETFs on the market and may offer greater scalability in the long term. Regardless of which ETF investors may lean towards, be aware that bond ETFs often grow significantly slower than stock ETFs, so don’t expect anything close to triple-digit returns annually.

    Before you buy stock in Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF, consider this:

    The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

    Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $414,554!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,120,663!*

    Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 884% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 193% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.

    See the 10 stocks »

    *Stock Advisor returns as of February 15, 2026.

    Adé Hennis has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Vanguard’s BND Offers Bigger Pay and Lower Fees Than Fidelity’s FIGB was originally published by The Motley Fool



    Source link

  • Orban rival accuses opponents of blackmail plot ahead of Hungary election

    Orban rival accuses opponents of blackmail plot ahead of Hungary election



    Peter Magyar suspects there are plans to release a sex tape of him from August 2024.



    Source link